> I kinda like the idea of a top-level compat category; it will keep the
> top level uncluttered when sysv and iBCS compatibility start requiring
> their own knobs, and if you put linux at the top level this will later
> be used as justification for putting all the other "compat" stuff up
> there too. I think it's a slippery slope.
Agreed. Sysctl's have a decent hierarchical structure; let's use it.
Examples of broken/unused hierarchical structures:
o .COM namespace.
o Average DOS user's hard disk management (everything off root).
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
