I agree with this as well. > > "Linux compatibility" > > "Linux ABI support" > > "Linux binary compatibility" > > The suggested "linux mode", has a nice non-technical simple ring to it. > If we called it this, the non-educated might not come away with the wrong > idea. Management(tm) may not understand "ABI" and the exact use of > "binary". > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Linuxulator: emulation? [was: Q: Extend... Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: Linuxulator: emulation? [was: Q: Ex... Tom Bartol
- Re: Linuxulator: emulation? [was: ... Peter S. Housel
- Re: Linuxulator: emulation? [was: ... Julian Elischer
- Re: Linuxulator: emulation? [w... Amancio Hasty
- Re: Linuxulator: emulation? [w... Alex Zepeda
- Re: Linuxulator: emulation? [w... Amancio Hasty
- Re: Linuxulator: emulation? [was: Q: Ex... Amancio Hasty
- Re: Linuxulator: emulation? [was: ... Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: Linuxulator: emulation? [w... David O'Brien
- Re: Linuxulator: emulation? [w... Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: Linuxulator: emulation? [was: ... Mike Smith
- Re: Q: Extending the sysctl MIB for Linuxulator variable... Mark Murray