"Matthew N. Dodd" wrote:
> > Agreed.  I like what I see there.  Maybe it is time to hoist something 
> > like that into bus_subr.c
> Lets define exactly what we want before we start our charge.
> What should be printed?
>       device ID
>       attachment point
>       resource reservation
>       device additional
> When should it be printed?
>       bootverbose levels?

Years ago I provided diffs to the kernel boot to report some probes Before 
as well as after, so one could see which probe was about to hang, - more use
than which probe was last to pass.  Idea was rejected as some thought it
was too verbose, but Nobody (me included) thought of having a
bootverbose levels switch to hang on it on.  ... Nice Idea !

Some Computer mags reccomend MS-* users to keep a boot flop for Linux or BSD,
as we provide much more diagnostics than MS*,  Before-probe-announcements
would make it more valuable still. Imagine if the more competent of the MS
crowd actually wanted to keep a FreeBSD boot floppy around :-)

Julian
Julian H. Stacey                                http://www.freebsd.org/~jhs/
  Considering Linux ?  Then also consider the 2000+ free packages for FreeBSD.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to