-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-08-20 15:42:12 -0400, Robert Moore wrote: > It appears to be a vendor thing. However, still in direct violation > of the ACPI spec.
I believe you're correct. FYI, Linux people have "Optimus" driver and you may find some info from their work: http://bumblebee-project.org/ Especially, this looks interesting regarding _DSM encoding: https://github.com/Bumblebee-Project/bbswitch Jung-uk Kim >> -----Original Message----- From: Sean Bruno >> [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 >> 12:33 PM To: Moore, Robert Cc: [email protected] Subject: >> RE: AMT Activation ACPI warnings >> >> On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 19:20 +0000, Moore, Robert wrote: >>> We have seen at least one video vendor that uses a Buffer >>> object instead of the ACPI-required package object as the 4th >>> _DSM argument. >>> >>> >> >> The T520 has a Nvidia thingy in it. Is this something we need to >> deal with in the BSD ACPI implementation or is this a vendor >> thing? >> >> Sean > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi To > unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[email protected]" > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSE9Q3AAoJECXpabHZMqHOsrwIAL5pIGgtv+XchpKDCENNuEUz nu9bFMltpDvZUoi/7ly9vkernIRg87XDIDJ5JkpdnVdwREsLZztbOC6aV0F1P1x4 GBEjns3CMKaTxRFgoHjXXgke0LcEunsawvN4bfYQ/WikV+hW6ZoKe2h7pC91rWP6 nK9X9ZYCmYfoMMPJbiF6ZcDhMyWA4zRKQPkKx7EA5XbkzbjMuy++DxqF9lCmQQ4y sZJtVpmlMowCFvcm2WUn6iIFVhvJZT40BKCOXFcUa8TqPtR5cV0Xg9H46kZE9tKt w5/jMbEvgwxoRLg/678tZ5qoi/Wd5MH2UKyLDHd+sxK3w4Yt56agJtI4aRWyiYw= =05PR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
