It appears to be a vendor thing. However, still in direct violation of the ACPI spec.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Sean Bruno [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 12:33 PM > To: Moore, Robert > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: RE: AMT Activation ACPI warnings > > On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 19:20 +0000, Moore, Robert wrote: > > We have seen at least one video vendor that uses a Buffer object > > instead of the ACPI-required package object as the 4th _DSM argument. > > > > > > The T520 has a Nvidia thingy in it. Is this something we need to deal > with in the BSD ACPI implementation or is this a vendor thing? > > Sean _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
