On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Jung-uk Kim <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday 19 April 2011 04:55 pm, Brandon Gooch wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Jung-uk Kim <[email protected]> > wrote: >> > On Tuesday 19 April 2011 04:02 pm, Warner Losh wrote: >> >> Having chased boogiemen in this area before, I think this patch >> >> makes good sense even though it breaks the device model a >> >> little. However, the hardware in question really is special on >> >> x86... >> >> >> >> Warner >> > >> > Actually I was working on a similar patch and it should be ready >> > soon. >> > >> > Jung-uk Kim >> >> You have a willing (if not completely capable) tester here, so I >> always look forward to your patches. > > :-) > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/syscons.diff > > Also attached here.
Cool, building now... I noticed you didn't grab the Giant lock, which shouldn't be needed since Ed's work, correct? >> As the situation has greatly improved, I hesitate to even say this, >> but...I wish the USB stack could be made to be suspend/resume >> resilient. It's really the only problem child in my laptop. >> Fortunately, it's easy enough to build the USB stack as modules and >> unload/reload them. > > I tried to do something about it but new USB stack is completely out > of my expertise, unfortunately. :-( > > Jung-uk Kim I understand, and again, I know it seems like I always bring it up to you whenever I get the chance -- because I do. Sorry :| I should bug someone else (Hans or Andrew Thompson), or maybe the PC-BSD guys might get interested in fixing this eventually -- after GEM, KMS, etc... ;) -Brandon _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
