On Tuesday 19 April 2011 04:02 pm, Warner Losh wrote: > Having chased boogiemen in this area before, I think this patch > makes good sense even though it breaks the device model a little. > However, the hardware in question really is special on x86...
Actually I was working on a similar patch and it should be ready soon. Jung-uk Kim > Warner > > On Apr 19, 2011, at 12:48 PM, Brandon Gooch wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Taku YAMAMOTO <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:31:33 +0900 > >> > >> Taku YAMAMOTO <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> A patch is attached. > >> > >> Mailman ate it ;) > >> Here it is. > >> > >> -- > >> -|-__ YAMAMOTO, Taku > >> > >> | __ < <[email protected]> > >> > >> - A chicken is an egg's way of producing more eggs. - > > > > Throughout testing, I've seen zero regressions. In fact, an issue > > that existed prior to this patch involving minor screen > > corruption (dirty VGA buffers) is gone (Intel Mobile 965 > > Express). > > > > Thank you so much guys! > > > > -Brandon > > _______________________________________________ > > [email protected] mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "[email protected]" > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[email protected]" _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
