On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 15:01 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 18-06-18 14:58, Igor Filatov wrote: > > I'd like to but I'm worried that people will have bad experience > > with these devices (esp. 96x96 ones) and blame libfprint. And I > > still haven't had the chance to pull in latest upstream, so... > > Well ATM people are just blindly adding new USB-ids without
Who's blindly doing that? > even getting all the improvements which have been done, so > although I agree that these devices need more work > (specifically a better match algorithm more suited for > low res devices), I still think it would be good to at least > get what we have upstream. I agree that even if we choose to disable those smaller resolution devices, we probably want the code to drive them to be upstreamed. We can easily hide those behind a compilation flag too. _______________________________________________ fprint mailing list fprint@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fprint
