Hi, On 18-06-18 14:58, Igor Filatov wrote:
I'd like to but I'm worried that people will have bad experience with these devices (esp. 96x96 ones) and blame libfprint. And I still haven't had the chance to pull in latest upstream, so...
Well ATM people are just blindly adding new USB-ids without even getting all the improvements which have been done, so although I agree that these devices need more work (specifically a better match algorithm more suited for low res devices), I still think it would be good to at least get what we have upstream. Regards, Hans
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 3:53 PM Bastien Nocera <had...@hadess.net <mailto:had...@hadess.net>> wrote: On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 15:11 +0100, Sébastien Béchet wrote: > On 2018-01-17 12:12, Igor Filatov wrote: > > Looks like o1ca as well https://github.com/iafilatov/libfprint/pull > > /4 > > Not o1ca but 0x0C1A. I create repository for POC: > > http://github.com/sbechet/elanfp Any plans on sending those changes from both trees up for merging on the freedesktop GitLab? _______________________________________________ fprint mailing list fprint@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fprint
_______________________________________________ fprint mailing list fprint@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fprint
