El 09/09/2020 a las 10:02, Bart via fpc-pascal escribió:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 8:37 AM LacaK via fpc-pascal
<fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> wrote:
I am still confused how this CodePage aware stuff is expected to work and when
implicit conversios are included (as far as I understand here ONLY
declared/static codepage plays role) and when dynamic codepage is taken into
account and when not?
You are not the only one.
Yeah. In fact, we could set up several self-help groups of codepage
victims ;-)
https://wiki.freepascal.org/Unicode_Support_in_Lazarus#Assign_string_literals_to_different_string_types
is scaring.
All the doubts, questions, and discussions prove that current system is
counter-intuitive and confusing.
I'm sorry, I don't want to bash, but code pages system must be revised
almost from scratch, even breaking compatibility. It is a heavy lodge
that FPC is carrying. The longer it takes to get rid of it, the worse.
--
Saludos
Santiago A.
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
