On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 17:16:05 +0200 Sven Barth via fpc-pascal <fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> wrote:
> Am 24.04.2019 um 15:28 schrieb Ryan Joseph: > > > >> On Apr 24, 2019, at 2:27 AM, Michael Van Canneyt > >> <mich...@freepascal.org> wrote: > >> > >> I would think this should be allowed, yes. I see no reason to > >> disallow it. > > Agreed but Sven says something about published fields though. The > > property just acts as simple alias so I don’t understand what the > > problem could be either. I’ll put this on my to-do list to fix in > > the compiler if it’s permitted. > No, you're not permitted. The issues that would currently appear with > published properties will also appear with non-published ones once > support for extended properties is added. And I definitely don't want > to fiddle around with that only because someone didn't like to write > some boilerplate code. Can you give some details about the issues? Mattias _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
