> On Apr 24, 2019, at 2:27 AM, Michael Van Canneyt <mich...@freepascal.org>
> wrote:
>
> I would think this should be allowed, yes. I see no reason to disallow it.
Agreed but Sven says something about published fields though. The property just
acts as simple alias so I don’t understand what the problem could be either.
I’ll put this on my to-do list to fix in the compiler if it’s permitted.
>
> That said, I see also no reason why on earth you would want to add this, as
> you can
> just access x ? The only sensible addition would be using a getter/setter,
> to do some kind of check or transformation.
I just wanted to add some R,G,B fields to a vector instead of adding them into
the vector itself. Minor code hygiene thing that would be nice to accommodate
but all the accessors required now makes this not so appealing.
Regards,
Ryan Joseph
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
