> On Dec 3, 2018, at 1:59 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The dummy symbol should only be created if there isn't an existing symbol
> with that name. So maybe something is buggy there. (Also the dummy symbol
> should be used for a non-generic routine if the order of declaration is the
> other way round)
>
I just looked it over and I was wrong about the dummy, it’s just a flag. If the
generic doesn’t cover existing functions then that messes up some assumptions I
made so I need re-think the design now.
Regards,
Ryan Joseph
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
