Ryan Joseph <r...@thealchemistguild.com> schrieb am So., 3. Juni 2018, 10:22:
> > > > On Jun 3, 2018, at 3:15 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal < > fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> wrote: > > > > Because operator overloads are static methods not normal methods. > > I don’t understand. Why aren’t both those variants possible? They’re both > static I believe. The first is mutating the left side value and the second > is a clone (the most common operation for += ) > > class operator + (var left: TIntArray; const right: T); > class operator + (constref left: TIntArray; const value: T): TIntArray; > Let me make one thing perfectly clear: the C-operators (+=, -=, *=, /=) do not exist as explicit operators in FPC. They are merely syntactic sugar for the more expressive variants and converted to those as soon as possible. Regards, Sven >
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
