> By all means, please reconsider this, and leave me the choice to define the > operators. If I want "+" for concatting, it is trivial to define it myself. > I don't need the language to force that and eseentially destroy operator > overloading for mathematical operations on dynamic arrays.
Same here. The semantics for vector operations on arrays was thoroughly explored in vector languages (APL, A+, J, K, etc). Doing per-element dyadic function application is the basis for it. Having proper operators overloads is crucial. @Sven Please reconsider "+" operator for arrays if your changes really forbid to overload operators for arrays now. Regards, Denis Golovan _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
