Depending on the number of possible sort orders, may be it is better to have one collection by possible sort order and to permanently keep the collections sorted.
2014-03-13 22:26 GMT+01:00 Jim Leonard <trix...@oldskool.org>: > On 3/13/2014 3:49 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: > >> You are sorting only for display purposes? >> > > No, re-sorting is part of the algorithm, which sorts a list of graphics > elements and then inserts/splits/deletes the collection entries, and then > repeats this process. The sort method can change each iteration depending > on the number and status of the entries. > > -- > Jim Leonard (trix...@oldskool.org) > Check out some trippy MindCandy: http://www.mindcandydvd.com/ > A child borne of the home computer wars: http://trixter.oldskool.org/ > You're all insane and trying to steal my magic bag! > _______________________________________________ > fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org > http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal >
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
