Am 27.12.2013 11:22 schrieb "Mark Morgan Lloyd" < markmll.fpc-pas...@telemetry.co.uk>: > > Reinier Olislagers wrote: >> >> On 27/12/2013 10:17, Lukasz Sokol wrote: >>> >>> On 26/12/13 12:13, Reinier Olislagers wrote: >>>> >>>> On 26/12/2013 13:09, Dennis Poon wrote: >>>> Search the archives for proposals for syntax like this that didn't lead >>>> to anything. >>>> >>>> >>> It did lead exactly to Sven >> >> >> Ah yes, you're right that *is* progress :) >> >> PS: I like it, too - used to it in .Net, but not too bothered by having >> to work around it. > > > For what it's worth, I'm ambivalent. Not because I feel that try stacks couldn't or shouldn't be simplified, but because I feel that whoever overloaded try for two different structures should be shot.
AFAIK most other languages that support a finally also use try for both. So I would say that Borland just went with the flow... Regards, Sven
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
