Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 27/12/2013 10:17, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
On 26/12/13 12:13, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 26/12/2013 13:09, Dennis Poon wrote:
Search the archives for proposals for syntax like this that didn't lead
to anything.
It did lead exactly to Sven
Ah yes, you're right that *is* progress :)
PS: I like it, too - used to it in .Net, but not too bothered by having
to work around it.
For what it's worth, I'm ambivalent. Not because I feel that try stacks
couldn't or shouldn't be simplified, but because I feel that whoever
overloaded try for two different structures should be shot.
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
