2013/3/15 Rainer Stratmann <rainerstratm...@t-online.de> > > Can you make a comparison against FPC target-embedded ? > FPC target-embedded is very complicated to install (Linux development > computer). >
I'm on Win32 (or Win32 on Parallels on Max OS X); I'll have to dig more to understand what is needed. > For 32 bit ARM I would try to use freepascal. > I got it work somehow. > any tip or guide would be appreciated, then. > > I'm just a little afraid of the potentially limited maturity of these. > What do you mean exactly with that? > I mean that (maybe) both FPC and mikroePascal are young products for the embedded world, so that I might be facing compiler or library propblems during the devlopment, besides my own project problems. > Am Friday 15 March 2013 07:48:25 schrieb Michael Ring: > > I also like their products, especially the development boards are very > > well designed. The IDE+debugger is nice & complete and the support fo > > the software is also very good. > Yes, they are busy with that stuff. And have a relatively good marketing > (important to earn money). > That's a +1 Roberto
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
