Am Friday 15 March 2013 01:27:51 schrieb Roberto P.: > Thanks a lot for your comments, very interesting indeed. > Can you make a comparison against FPC target-embedded ? FPC target-embedded is very complicated to install (Linux development computer). > I routinely write in C for the microcontrollers I use, but now with ARM > Cortex M3 I could try Pascal. For 32 bit ARM I would try to use freepascal. I got it work somehow. > I'm just a little afraid of the potentially limited maturity of these. What do you mean exactly with that? > Thanks! > > Roberto
Am Friday 15 March 2013 07:48:25 schrieb Michael Ring: > I also like their products, especially the development boards are very > well designed. The IDE+debugger is nice & complete and the support fo > the software is also very good. Yes, they are busy with that stuff. And have a relatively good marketing (important to earn money). > The things I do not like are that you have to buy a license for each > compiler family (PIC, PIC16, PIC 32, ARM), ... > the compiler parser sometimes > is a little odd yes > and, most important for me, they do not support objects > and have no plans to do so. But for little projects (AVR 8 bit controllers) this is the best choice. > When you can live without objects a good choice, when you need objects > then freepascal is your choice. In general for 32 bit ARM I would choose freepascal. > Michael _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
