On 31.08.2012 12:12, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Friday 31 August 2012 11:23:49 schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Friday 31 August 2012 10:38:32 schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
FPC is mature in terms of
age, mature in terms of stability, and mature in terms of the
developers
not liking changing established features: sometimes that frustrates
almost everybody, but it's something to be lived with.
So why use Delphi anymore?
And try to be Delphi compatible at any cost?
How does one error message add to or detract from Delphi compatibility?
I did not say that as you can read above.
You can make private mails from me public, but then you must accept my
public response.
I am not aware of your having sent me any private emails, and I
certainly haven't solicited any: the only mail that legitimately arrives
in this account is from the list.
@Jonas: just a clarification for Mark.
@Mark: The following part you quoted does not seem to have been sent to
the mailing list as the corresponding mail from Rainer where you quote
from is not in the archive:
Rainer Stratmann wrote:
> Am Friday 31 August 2012 10:38:32 schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
>> FPC is mature in terms of
>> age, mature in terms of stability, and mature in terms of the developers
>> not liking changing established features: sometimes that frustrates
>> almost everybody, but it's something to be lived with.
>
> So why use Delphi anymore?
> And try to be Delphi compatible at any cost?
Regards,
Sven
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
