On 30/08/2012 18:13, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
> On 30-8-2012 18:44, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
[...]
>> Ok so you prefer to let the beginner leave out in the rain.
>> Because he and someone else (more experienced) _could_ mislead a clearly
>> formulated message (are you in the right syntax mode?).
>
> Tomas (and Mark) explained with coherent, well written, valid reasoning
> why implementing this idea of yours would be too much work for too
> little gain.
> Then you go and repeat your initial stance (tinged with an accusatory
> undertone) without taking into account that reasoning.
> Strange.
>
> I'd propose you either get stuck in the sources and figure out a patch
> that covers all corner cases (both already described and any others) ("I
> don't think that it is that difficult to implement") or... accept the
> people that posted won't do it.
>
> Also, emphasizing positive aspects/solutions in posts (instead of
> negative aspects) may lead to a bigger chance of convincing people to do
> things your way.
> It will definitely make for a nicer atmosphere.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Reinier
[OT]
Wonder if R.S. can take a hint at least from somebody with same-sounding name :J
L.
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
