> Why do you say that? > > It's not because I personally think that no extra solution is needed, > that I am oblivious to the problems of users. > > We'll solve the problem, thereby improving sqldb. > I will implement it myself next week: > > * Change default library names to make more sense. > * Implement library loader for cases where the default library > name is not the correct one. > > That the implementation is not how you would have done it, > is a minor detail, I hope; The problem can and will be solved, > that's the main thing. >
I'm glad to see I was mistaken in interpreting the way this discussion was going. Probably seen too many other discussions and initiatives that end up nowhere. I only suggested the easiest and commonly used solution. You know I would have written the patch for it if that was needed. If your implementation is better in the overall sqldb scheme of things then so much the better;) Ludo _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
