Am Tuesday 07 August 2012 19:13:29 schrieb Martin: > On 07/08/2012 17:58, Rainer Stratmann wrote: > > With the compiler keyword 'calleradresstable'; > > > > function s( str : pchar ) : pchar; calleradresstable; > > > > Then the compiler makes a table of all calleradresses and also the amount > > of s() in the program. > > With the rtl function getcalleradresstable() then I get a pointer and the > > amount of the array. > > Interesting. I couldn't find any documentation on them, and fpc 2.6.0 > does give an error.
That is my wish to a compiler programmer. Can one hear me? Who programs the compiler? > But yes, with this added info, I can at least see what you try todo. > > >> I can see 2 ways you get that address > >> > >> procedure p (snip:string); > >> begin > >> calleraddr := get_caller_addr(); //needs to be implemented > >> ...... > >> end > > > > It exists already: > > http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/rtl/system/get_caller_addr.html > > I knew there was something like it. But didnt have the name. So I gave a > dummy name, and commented it. > > But now, I have another question: > > Despite calleradresstable not working for me, if it does for you, then > what is the problem? > > Sure get_caller_addr() returns the "return address" so it will differ. It returns a _unique_ handle. That is what I need. Perhaps there will be some offset. May be a compiler programmer can get the exact adresses and table for this wish. > I do > not know haw big the offset can be at max. But unless you include a > disassembler, or debug-line info, you can not get exact details. But likely > you can assume a maximum offset (depending if calleradresstable is the asm > or pascal statement address). _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
