Am Monday 06 August 2012 22:17:11 schrieb Martin: > But let me say: I am with everyone else. Using stack/caller info is the > wrong(est) way. I fully agree. > And if you need to ask "What is the content of the stack?" Then you > should not use it. > All this functions are very low level. Usinc this kind of data implies > having a very good understanding of the way the stack is organized.
> Why do you not keep al ist of all the snippets you have seen (keep a > copy of the text (strings are copy on write, so you do not need a real > copy, just a 2nd string of the same text). Can you explain it more? I want not search through the sourcecode, because it makes it less easy. All I need is all caller adresses of p1 in the program. Or an incremented counter at compiletime. Both seems impossible by now. If p1 is called then I can see which snippet was not yet called. If the compilerincremented counter at the end is 500, then I need 500 snippet entries and I can see which entry already was called by the program during execution. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
