On Thu, 19 Apr 2012, Ludo Brands wrote:
As for re-using existing terminology (schema data etc.), this
is dangerous
as it creates the expectation that the implementation
conforms to a certain
standard, which is what I want to avoid.
(I don't believe I've ever used the word schema in connection
to a database. I think of an electrical wiring blueprint if I
hear that word ;) )
There are other databases (mssql, oracle) where it is difficult to not use
schemas. So even when not using the word 'schema' the concept should be
represented somewhere.
Ehm, the datadictionary is the schema ?
Unless I misunderstand the meaning of schema :-)
Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
