> As for re-using existing terminology (schema data etc.), this > is dangerous > as it creates the expectation that the implementation > conforms to a certain > standard, which is what I want to avoid. > > (I don't believe I've ever used the word schema in connection > to a database. I think of an electrical wiring blueprint if I > hear that word ;) ) >
There are other databases (mssql, oracle) where it is difficult to not use schemas. So even when not using the word 'schema' the concept should be represented somewhere. Ludo _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
