On 8 December 2011 12:56, Schindler Karl-Michael wrote: > about a more accurate method, which is too expensive for your application at > the > moment.
Yeah, I'll just tell my clients that they can't run my app yet, we need to wait a few more years for Intel and AMD to catch up to my work. Like that would fly! > How disgraceful is a replacement by a less accurate solution I never had the intention to remove FPC's Random MT implementation completely. Simply make it the non-default option, and move it into a more specialized unit (maths.pp) where other more specialized math and statistical functions are defined. > and how about the grace to implement your own solution In the mean time, I have implemented my own faster performing random generator, and used that instead. Even though my problem is now solved, I would still like to make the change to FPC too. I'll prepare a patch and see what the FPC developers say. -- Regards, - Graeme - _______________________________________________ fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit http://fpgui.sourceforge.net _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
