2011/10/19 Tomas Hajny <xhaj...@hajny.biz>: > Sorry for a silly question, but why the difference between the two > implementations (i.e. why not addressing the WideStr element directly > without the typecast)?
Actually it should be a pointer operation in the ansistring version too, because setting chars in a string calls UniqueString, which is undesirable and inneficient. > Moreover, even if using the PWideChar, I believe > that the correct version would be without the '@' (i.e.: > PWideChar(widestr)[len] := #0), wouldn't it? Good idea! I think you found the problem. -- Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
