Marcos Douglas escreveu:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara
<luiz...@oi.com.br> wrote:
Marcos Douglas escreveu:
Hi Luiz,
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:35 PM, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara
<luiz...@oi.com.br> wrote:
Take a look at
http://lazarusroad.blogspot.com/2008/11/effect-of-using-constant-parameter-for.html
Then, this continue true how I said in other mail:
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Marcos Douglas <m...@delfire.net> wrote:
Always use 'const' for 'strings' because this is faster. Strings will
be passed by reference.
And about not string types, is more faster too? eg: foo (const i: Integer)
No. I did this test too. Double should also benefit but the generated
assembler is equal with or without const.
Exactly.
Therefore I always used 'const' only at 'strings' params. I thought it
had changed, but not. ;-)
It can be useful for record parameters also
Luiz
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
