On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara <luiz...@oi.com.br> wrote: > Marcos Douglas escreveu: >> >> Hi Luiz, >> >> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:35 PM, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara >> <luiz...@oi.com.br> wrote: >> >>> >>> Take a look at >>> >>> http://lazarusroad.blogspot.com/2008/11/effect-of-using-constant-parameter-for.html >>> >>> >> >> Then, this continue true how I said in other mail: >> >> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Marcos Douglas <m...@delfire.net> wrote: >> >>> >>> Always use 'const' for 'strings' because this is faster. Strings will >>> be passed by reference. >>> >> >> And about not string types, is more faster too? eg: foo (const i: Integer) >> > > No. I did this test too. Double should also benefit but the generated > assembler is equal with or without const.
Exactly. Therefore I always used 'const' only at 'strings' params. I thought it had changed, but not. ;-) Marcos Dougla _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
