On Tue, 6 Apr 2010, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
Well, It is the least work for them.
Except that they'll have a HUGE amount of bugs to fix, if you look at the
FreeCLX bugtracker on sourceforge :-)
FreeCLX was afaik based on K1, and K2..K3 followed, and maybe some post K3
development. I don't think FreeCLX is a good measure for the state of CLX.
FreeCLX = CLX. There is no difference, Borland never gave up
control over it.
FreeCLX = CLX v1. The remark was about versioning, not control.
People mostly debug the windows app, and only the crossplatform bits
remotely.r
The GUI is cross-platform, hence there will be bugs in the GUI that pop up
only when run on some platform.
Yes. And that will have to be done using remote debugging. And yes, that is
not the best possible solution. But it is not impossible, I do it nearly
every day with D2009.
But the best possible solution (everything everywhere 100% native) is simply
not realistic from a business perspective.
Why not? Lazarus does it.
Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
