On Tue, 6 Apr 2010, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
Well, It is the least work for them.
Except that they'll have a HUGE amount of bugs to fix, if you look at the
FreeCLX bugtracker on sourceforge :-)
FreeCLX was afaik based on K1, and K2..K3 followed, and maybe some post K3
development. I don't think FreeCLX is a good measure for the state of CLX.
FreeCLX = CLX. There is no difference, Borland never gave up
control over it.
In each case, the decision for remote debugging is IMHO fatal.
I would never want to work like that; it simply is not practical.
I don't think an all out approach (Kylix like) for multiple platforms etc
makes sense.
I think this approach suits the expected target crowd (Delphi users that
occasionally want to make a crossplatform binary) better.
People mostly debug the windows app, and only the crossplatform bits
remotely.r
The GUI is cross-platform, hence there will be bugs in the GUI that pop up
only when run on some platform.
Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
