On 07/12/2009 19:41, ik wrote:
http://ik.homelinux.org/
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Jonas Maebe <jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be
<mailto:jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be>> wrote:
On 07 Dec 2009, at 15:19, Frank Peelo wrote:
On 07/12/2009 13:40, ik wrote:
Now it works properly. However it seems like the not is for
the "in" rather then the key if it inside the pertness.
"pertness"? I would love to know what that was before babelfish
got it...
I put my money on an (auto-correcting) spell checker that changed a
misspelled "parentheses" ("perentes" maybe) :)
Yes :)
Fair enough. "Pert" is a word I hardly ever see, except occasionally in
connection with breasts. I thought "set" was intended, rather than
brackets. Couldn't think what word, similar to "set", could translate as
forward, presumptuous, beautiful, lively, fresh or any other meaning to
do with "pert".
Frank
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
