http://ik.homelinux.org/
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Jonas Maebe <jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be>wrote:
>
> On 07 Dec 2009, at 15:19, Frank Peelo wrote:
>
> On 07/12/2009 13:40, ik wrote:
>>
>>> Now it works properly. However it seems like the not is for the "in"
>>> rather then the key if it inside the pertness.
>>>
>>
>> "pertness"? I would love to know what that was before babelfish got it...
>>
>
> I put my money on an (auto-correcting) spell checker that changed a
> misspelled "parentheses" ("perentes" maybe) :)
Yes :)
My native language is non latin based, and you write what you hear (unlike
latin based languages). English is my 3rd language (more or less), so I do
not know always the meaning of the suggested word in the speller (regarding
the way it is written).
>
>
> Key is a char, so what should
>> not Key
>> mean?
>>
>
>
> Indeed, unary operators (such as "not") have a higher precedence than
> binary operators.
>
Thanks, that explains it.
>
>
> Jonas
>
>
Ido
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
