Op zaterdag 20-06-2009 om 16:25 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Jonas Maebe: > On 20 Jun 2009, at 16:15, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote: > > > Modified LGPL just isn't good enought, because it's not unique enough. > > Modified in which way? By who? > > > > I would like to have a name for our license, what do you think? I > > suggest: > > > > * Free Pascal LGPL --> shortened to FPLGPL > > I think that would be a bad name, because > a) there is nothing specific to the FPC project about this license > b) many other projects also use this form of licensing (just google > for "lgpl static linking exception" without the quotes)
This exception is often called the "classpath exception". So the license we use already has a name. > Simply "LGPL with static linking exception" seems fine to me as a > description. That's also clear enough. Joost. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
