On 20 Jun 2009, at 16:15, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
Modified LGPL just isn't good enought, because it's not unique enough.
Modified in which way? By who?
I would like to have a name for our license, what do you think? I
suggest:
* Free Pascal LGPL --> shortened to FPLGPL
I think that would be a bad name, because
a) there is nothing specific to the FPC project about this license
b) many other projects also use this form of licensing (just google
for "lgpl static linking exception" without the quotes)
Simply "LGPL with static linking exception" seems fine to me as a
description.
Jonas
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
