On Wednesday 19 April 2006 11.55, Marco van de Voort wrote: > > This could be caused by Kylix being able to some > more advanced types of smartlinking due to own linker. (e.g. vtable > optimization) > And I suspect RTTI info.
> If your binaries use libc, recompiling FPC with dFPC_USE_LIBC might bring > -the size down a further 10-40k. > > But I think these size differences are irrelevant and peanuts. I don't see > what advantage 200k brings. > Agreed. And if compressed the difference is only some per cent . Martin _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
