L505 wrote: > > I think this is poor marketing for FPC: telling people that size/bloat is not > an issue. > Then what good is FPC for us? FPC is a compiled language! The whole point of > a compiled > language, is to have SOME advantage over an interpreted language. What is > this advantage, > if not size/memory/footprint? I don't see any advantages.
The memory footprint of a good interpreter is lower than that one of a compiled program. Guess why a lot of programs in the 80s were written in interpreted basic :) Only the bad design of most interpreters cause big memory footprint. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
