Sasa Zeman wrote: >> Not in a modern version. It won't even start probably. > > FPC can be comparable with command line compiler of Delphi 7.
Yes? So Delphi has multi platform support and has maintainable compiler sources? > D2005-6 > compile C/C++ (CBuilder) code among other features raise complexity, which > are not FPC tasks. > >> If we would try to match that, uncompromisingly, with Free Pascal, we >> would have to put nearly everything else on hold. That is not sane. > > It seems that all previously produced compiled code left in memory, even if It seems but it isn't the case :) > it is not needed anymore. If that is true, small reorganization may be > helpful. > >> That is one way to say it. The other way is just buy new memory to avoid >> FPC developers have to spend disproportionate amounts of time to keep >> the software running with very old systems. > > Older comuters use memory type is not available anymore, So you use older memory than edo-simms? Even more, SD-RAM is no issue and iirc SD is used for almost 10 years. Some months ago, I bought edo simms for an ~10 year old machine which couldn't be replaced and it was no problem to get the memory modules. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
