> Please keep in mind that FPC/Lazarus is OSS and that it lives from it's > user's contributions.
It seem that you missunderstood. As a developer, I'm not interested in looking FPC code nor tracking future plans (details are alse never published, only future plans), but using it to create working applications. >From that point of view it is non-logocal and even insolting : "Please stop asking for pathetic requirements. Especially for things where you don't know where you are talking about and therefor without in-depth analyses where things could be improved." Or "If you want to work with development code i think it is better to find out it yourself what is going wrong. " - especially that bugs in 2.0.2 require using development code... This mailing list is for FPC developers only? Please clarify and update information on main mailing-list page. > If you don't like the idea of OSS, better stay with Delphi and hope that it survives :) Since I testing FPC and Lazarus, I'm intersting in using it. However, FPC and Lazarus currently cannot be competition to Delphi/Kylix. But the most important advantages are daily updates and upgrades and we hope it will become worthy competitor one day. And stay OpenSource, in which I doubt if Delphi discontinue. Good luck. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal