On Monday 03 January 2005 19:22, Jonas Maebe wrote: > Delphi does not allow members of records to be used as counters at > all. We're probably going to do the same thing in the future,
You're already sort of done this. ;-) (See my second message yesterday "operator overloading broken in 1.9.6?", so *this* question is answered in some way). Don't get me wrong: It's very good that you don't allow loop counters to be changed inside a for-loop now, but ... > because > checking whether or not a counter variable is modified in a loop is > incompatible with the way record field symbols are stored (as you > discovered before). ... personally I don't like this part of the idea. There was a reason, I used those "loop"-records. Ok, I'll shut up for now and change the code. Regards, Vinzent. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
