Hi Tobias, On Sat, 2018-04-21 at 15:12 +0200, Tobias Mueller wrote: > [SNIP] > Am I right in assuming that you would not pursue a referendum if the > board does not further decide on the current draft?
You are right that this would render many of my reasons to push for a referendum (or an alternative) obsolete. However, I do not believe that this is a feasible solution considering that there are good chunks of the community who are strongly in favour of the Foundation regulating events in this way. > [SNIP] > > You have another interesting mechanism at your disposal that we used in > 2012: You can ask for amendment of the bylaws to include provisions that > you desire, cf. Article XVII: > https://people.gnome.org/~tobiasmue/bylaws2012/bylaws.html#amendments While interesting, I am unsure as to how it applicable to this case. Benjamin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
