On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 4:36 AM Benjamin Berg <benja...@sipsolutions.net>
wrote:

> On Tue, 2018-04-17 at 19:09 -0700, Cosimo Cecchi wrote:
> > We discussed the topic of Events Code of Conduct during today's board
> > meeting.
> >
> > The board intends to consider your motion separately from the Code of
> > Conduct that was proposed by the working group; we will soon proceed
> > to seek membership consultation on the working group proposal.
>
> I think my stance is quite clear. As Allan stated quite literally, he
> continued working on the Draft without including the rest of the WG in
> this work. Regardless of whether Allan was acting as a board member or
> chairman of the WG, he has overstepped his authority by doing so. As
> such, I do not consider the current documents to be a legitimate
> proposal from the WG that the board could even start to consider.
>

It seems to me that Allan and Neil are free to take the (public) draft and
amend it any way they like without consulting the rest of the working
group, as long as they don't misrepresent it as a product of the working
group. As would you or I, for that matter, be free to do.

And, although I'm not familiar enough with the bylaws to say for sure what
applies in this case, it also seems to me that since the board can delegate
responsibilities to committees, the board can also rescind them — for
example, if they feel that a committee is no longer capable of fulfilling
them, which seems to be the case here. I have no idea what the board
intends to do, but as far as I can tell, they are not obligated to consider
the working group's proposal.

In the end, the board was elected by us, the working group was not, so it's
up to the board to do what they feel best represents the foundation
members' interests. I don't see any overstep of authority here. This
particular foundation member's interest lies in adopting a code of conduct
sooner rather than later, and not in voting in a referendum forced because
of a never-explained personality conflict.

Regards,
Philip C
_______________________________________________
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list

Reply via email to