On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 05:07:43PM +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote: > I can see your concern with user-visible vs. non-visible projects, e.g. > libraries vs. user visible apps, but I feel this is also a non issue > because in fact; we have always had an easier time to find funding for > the development of our platform - and as long as we continue to produce > a platform that is competitive and remains useful to a wide variety of > applications outside of just the "GNOME Desktop" use cases, this will > remain true. > > It would seem to me at least, it is the user visible apps within GNOME > which have been left behind in funding, and need to resort to public > fundraising, because (almost) nobody is building products and > generating revenue with these highly GNOME Desktop specific user facing > Apps.
It depends, there are apps that are/were well funded (for example gnome-builder), and there are libraries under-funded (for example GtkSourceView). -- Sébastien _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
