On Mar 28, 2016 9:20 AM, "Michael Catanzaro" <mcatanz...@gnome.org> wrote: > > On Sun, 2016-03-27 at 07:53 +0000, Florian Müllner wrote: > > Distributions appear in the video in the order of when 3.20 is > > expected to > > be included in the distribution. > > It's hard to believe that's what's intended. If so, it's very wrong. > The order depicted in the video is: > > Arch -> Debian -> Fedora -> openSUSE > > which is correct under no interpretation I can think of.
Alphabetic. > How could > Debian possibly be depicted prior to Fedora? If we are counting stable > distros, then Debian should be towards the end of the list, after even > Ubuntu. Same for openSUSE: > > Arch (April) -> Fedora (June) -> (Ubuntu, October) -> openSUSE? > (November?) -> Debian (2017) -> openSUSE? (November 2017?) > > I do not know where openSUSE goes in relation to Debian, because they > have the new enterprise base thing going on, and I am not sure what > their GNOME plans are for the next release. If they release in November > with GNOME 3.20, then they belong in front of Debian; if they release > with 3.18 or perhaps 3.16 again, then they belong behind Debian. > > Now, if we are counting unstable distros (which I do not think we > should do), then the order would be: > > Fedora rawhide (immediate) -> Arch Gnome-Unstable (already has it) -> > openSUSE Tumbleweed (probably early April) -> Debian sid (probably this > spring) -> Ubuntu (probably this summer) > > I don't see any way that Arch -> Debian -> Fedora -> openSUSE could > possibly be interpreted as the correct order, if that graphic is really > intended to signify the real order. > > Michael > _______________________________________________ > foundation-list mailing list > foundation-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
_______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
