On Sun, 2016-03-27 at 07:53 +0000, Florian Müllner wrote: > Distributions appear in the video in the order of when 3.20 is > expected to > be included in the distribution.
It's hard to believe that's what's intended. If so, it's very wrong. The order depicted in the video is: Arch -> Debian -> Fedora -> openSUSE which is correct under no interpretation I can think of. How could Debian possibly be depicted prior to Fedora? If we are counting stable distros, then Debian should be towards the end of the list, after even Ubuntu. Same for openSUSE: Arch (April) -> Fedora (June) -> (Ubuntu, October) -> openSUSE? (November?) -> Debian (2017) -> openSUSE? (November 2017?) I do not know where openSUSE goes in relation to Debian, because they have the new enterprise base thing going on, and I am not sure what their GNOME plans are for the next release. If they release in November with GNOME 3.20, then they belong in front of Debian; if they release with 3.18 or perhaps 3.16 again, then they belong behind Debian. Now, if we are counting unstable distros (which I do not think we should do), then the order would be: Fedora rawhide (immediate) -> Arch Gnome-Unstable (already has it) -> openSUSE Tumbleweed (probably early April) -> Debian sid (probably this spring) -> Ubuntu (probably this summer) I don't see any way that Arch -> Debian -> Fedora -> openSUSE could possibly be interpreted as the correct order, if that graphic is really intended to signify the real order. Michael _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
