On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 06:15:22PM +0100, Allan Day wrote: > Again speaking as a member of the Engagement Team, I would say that > OPW has made it easier for us to talk about what GNOME does in a > coherent manner, rather than making it more difficult.
The general consensus that I see is that GNOME is without funds due to OPW. A status update from the board would be welcome. During AGM it was mentioned that it was decided that no status update would be given atm. I think such a status update is overdue. I think OPW is great. Having it ran by GNOME is great as well. Lack of status update is bad. Having OPW funds under the same legal entity is IMO questionable. I think it should be a separate legal entity. For as it already caused risks, and I don't see how this is aligned with mission statement. Meaning: A lot of money is being moved via GNOME. GNOME has special status (the donate for free bit), IMO legal entity would be needed. -- Regards, Olav _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
