Probably didn't read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:General_disclaimer 
and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Risk_disclaimer

Techman224

On 2012-03-20, at 6:28 PM, Newyorkbrad wrote:

> http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2012/2012_02069.htm
> 
> Wikipedia is cited in footnote 3 to dissenting opinion (see the very
> end of the decision).  The majority opinion responds that "as of yet,
> Wikipedia is not recognized source material for serious
> jurisprudential analysis."
> 
> (Caution: the facts of the case are unpleasant.)
> 
> Newyorkbrad
> 
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Reply via email to