Probably didn't read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:General_disclaimer and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Risk_disclaimer
Techman224 On 2012-03-20, at 6:28 PM, Newyorkbrad wrote: > http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2012/2012_02069.htm > > Wikipedia is cited in footnote 3 to dissenting opinion (see the very > end of the decision). The majority opinion responds that "as of yet, > Wikipedia is not recognized source material for serious > jurisprudential analysis." > > (Caution: the facts of the case are unpleasant.) > > Newyorkbrad > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l