http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2012/2012_02069.htm
Wikipedia is cited in footnote 3 to dissenting opinion (see the very end of the decision). The majority opinion responds that "as of yet, Wikipedia is not recognized source material for serious jurisprudential analysis." (Caution: the facts of the case are unpleasant.) Newyorkbrad _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
